JUST IN - U.S. Supreme Court refuses to review #Pennsylvania election cases. No standing before an election, moot after. Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissent from the denial.
By 6-3 vote (over dissents from Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch), #SCOTUS *denies* certiorari in the Pennsylvania case in which Republicans had challenged the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's three-day extension of the deadline to receive mail-in ballots:
JUST IN: The United States Supreme Court has REFUSED to review Pennsylvania Election Cases.. No Standing before an election, moot after. Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas Dissent from the Denial..
Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch endorse the radical proposition that SCOTUS has authority to overturn the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's interpretation of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
Thomas claims mail voting is inherently suspect, unreliable, and rife with fraud. https://t.co/DpQwPgl20Q
#ELB: Breaking and Analysis: Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Cases Over Conduct of Election in Pennsylvania, With Justices Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas Dissenting https://t.co/ufkeT1lheK
SCOTUS declines to take up a pair of leftover cases from the 2020 election. They involved the authority of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to extend the state's mail-in ballot deadline. Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch say the court should have granted review. https://t.co/RkzsCeb1Hi
SCOTUS dismisses the Pennsylvania election cases as moot, over the dissents of Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch. These cases challenged the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's three-day extension of the mail ballot deadline. https://t.co/atGKe6GHrH
BREAKING: Scotus won't take up Pennsylvania elections case that challenged state supreme court decisions to extend deadline for mail-in ballots. Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch disagree
Breaking: #SCOTUS denies review in the Pennsylvania election cases. Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissent and would have heard the cases.
¡Empieza la desbandada! 😱
👉Transportistas de Edomex renuncian al PRI y se suman a MORENA
Esto no pondrá muy contento a Alito Moreno. 😅
thomas, alito, and gorsuch want everyone to know that they've taken upon themselves the task of interpreting every state's constitutions and substituting their judgments for that of the states' supreme courts. but only when it comes to suppressing the vote of course
BREAKING: Supreme Court declines taking up leftover election fraud cases, including Pennsylvania mail-in ballot cases. Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch were the only justices to say the cases deserved consideration.
You can find Justice Thomas’s opinion, dissenting from denial of cert. in two-Pennsylvania election cases, and Justice Alito’s separate dissent joined by Justice Gorsuch in the same cases, at this link beginning at page 25 of the pdf. https://t.co/PlzwxgINv5
SCOTUS also declined to take up Republicans' challenge to a PA Supreme Court decision that allowed the state count mail-in ballots received three days after Election Day; Thomas/Alito/Gorsuch dissented https://t.co/F0jzl1G9IK
Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch hate democracy with the white hot intensity of a thousand suns.
La Cour suprême des États-Unis refuse de réexaminer le recours des fraudes électorales de Pennsylvanie. Les juges Alito, Gorsuch et Thomas sont en désaccord avec le refus. https://t.co/4NDSfRD0fj
SCOTUS swiftly and unsurprisingly rejected some election-related cases like Texas's longshot attempt at suing states that Biden won. But the PA case was one where advocates weren't as sure, since Thomas/Alito/Gorsuch had signaled interest, see: https://t.co/3paLbpbY2n
(Nov 2020) Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, wrote that there is a strong likelihood that the three-day extension of receipt of ballots ordered by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court violates the Federal Constitution.
Thomas, Gorsuch, and Alito publicly dissent from the court’s refusal to hear the PA cases.
BREAKING - U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Even review #Pennsylvania election cases. Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissent from the denial. “With Liberty & Justice for ALL” . Where’s the JUSTICE is no one Even reviews the THOUSANDS of pages. The Swamp is Deep on #SCOTUS too ! https://t.co/y89M8YZ7yk
Última hora: la Corte Suprema de EE. UU. Se niega a revisar #Pennsylvania casos electorales. No presentarse ante una elección, discutible después de que los jueces Alito, Gorsuch y Thomas disienten de la negación. https://t.co/Rurm4lfEUe
NOTE: Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissent from the denial.
(Nov 2020) The 3 Justices: "There is a strong likelihood that the 3-day extension of receipt of ballots ordered by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court violates the Federal Constitution."
US Supreme Court refuses to review #Pennsylvania election cases Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch say court should have granted review⚖️
It takes 4 justices to hear a case these cases were only one vote away from getting a full hearing Kavanaugh and Barrett denied the cases💣 https://t.co/SWU1dexfDu
Naquela suprema corte americana só o Samuel Alito e o Clarence Thomas que são juízes de qualidade, o resto são incompetentes. Pelo menos eles tem 2 juízes que prestam, de 9. O Brasil tem 11 e nenhum presta.
No election cases granted. Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissent on the PA case.
If one more justice had joined them, we would have the PA case heard. Really disappointed in Kavanagh and Barrett.
Full Document - BREAKING: Supreme Court Refuses to Review Pennsylvania Election Cases – Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas Dissent https://t.co/xvAiF42XGV
Why didn't Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh join the dissent with Justices Thomas, Gorsuch and Alito?
What the hell is their problem?
Chief Justice Roberts should probably resign - no way this dude isn't corrupt.
Alito and Gorsuch signed a separate dissent and joined Thomas.