Obstruction Was the Collusion

Obstruction Was the Collusion is trending on Twitter. Popular tweets on Obstruction Was the Collusion.
See top twitter trends from United States.

Brian Krassenstein
@krassenstein
@EdKrassen @realDonaldTrump Trump literally announced on international television that he fired Comey because of the Russia probe. He then told Kislyak in the Oval Office the same thing As @benjaminwittes points out, the Obstruction was the Collusion, or a part of it We've been saying this for 2yrs
12 Jan, 12:09 PM UTC
emptywheel
@emptywheel
Folks newly discovering that Trump's "obstruction" was "collusion" (including the people who pimped the obstruction-only story for a year in defiance of public evidence) still aren't thinking about why Flynn got fired.
12 Jan, 02:23 AM UTC
Seth Abramson
@SethAbramson
Wittes here catches up to what many of us have said for two years: Trump's obstruction was collusive. But it's not an either/or: the evidence tells us there was also pre-election collusion. This article seems to hail from 2017—well before all we know now. https://t.co/3KIsAPiIGn
12 Jan, 02:16 AM UTC
Lawfare
@lawfareblog
"What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell," the latest from Benjamin Wittes: https://t.co/GMgwj6oCOm
12 Jan, 01:55 AM UTC
Neal Katyal
@neal_katyal
Am trying to catch sense of all the TrumpRussia news over the last hours while we’ve been tied up. As usual @benjaminwittes does the trick. https://t.co/ybmJCm9d9V
12 Jan, 06:36 AM UTC
Andrea Mitchell
@mitchellreports
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/sk7NvVxSp8
12 Jan, 04:37 AM UTC
Renato Mariotti
@renato_mariotti
Trump’s obstruction of the Russia investigation was the “collusion,” writes @benjaminwittes, analyzing the new @nytimes bombshell that the FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation to determine if Trump worked to help Russia against our interests. https://t.co/DVUZKtCS31
12 Jan, 01:58 AM UTC
David Priess
@DavidPriess
“We might be in a position to revisit the relationship between the ‘collusion’ and obstruction components of the Mueller investigation,” writes @benjaminwittes. “I now believe they are far more integrated with one another than I previously understood.” https://t.co/BbCqOpBo0G
12 Jan, 02:08 AM UTC
Scarlet 🔥💫
@ScarletAvengers
“What if the Obstruction was the Collusion?” Benjamin Wittes asks. MUST READ Lawfare recommended by Professor Tribe: “This is big” https://t.co/OffwvjDX6C
12 Jan, 12:28 PM UTC
John Weaver
@jwgop
Take time to read this: What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/CciaedqGyV
12 Jan, 01:08 PM UTC
🇨🇦 Golden Resister
@rjcrock2003
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/it0dqnvCrp
12 Jan, 01:35 PM UTC
(((evan shapiro)))
@eshap
The NYT FBI bombshell is BIG. But @benjaminwittes’ conclusions re what it MEANS: mind-BLOWING. “There are NOT 2 probes: Obstruction & Collusion. There is ONE probe: A Counterintelligence Investigation into the National Security Threat from Russia.” 1/ https://t.co/Vv9xYJMWU6
12 Jan, 01:36 PM UTC
o'neill
@johnoneillnyc
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York’s Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/ghuK2kDsvA
12 Jan, 01:51 AM UTC
Sam Berger
@SamBerger_DC
As @benjaminwittes writes: the NYT report suggests "obstruction was the collusion, or at least part of it." The obstruction statute is "merely one set of statutes investigators might think about using to deal with a national security risk." /2 https://t.co/WbbMCnEUGX
12 Jan, 01:27 PM UTC
Ron Copfer
@rcopfer
He may lose his marbles, very soon... What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/VjKvWm0vaN
12 Jan, 01:33 PM UTC
The Glare
@TheGlare_TM
The obstruction was — and continues to be — the continuation of — and payback for — the collusion.
12 Jan, 01:53 PM UTC
Adam Sherman
@adamshermanesq
“The investigation is not at its core an investigation of Trump campaign “coordination” with Russia, much less of Trump himself. The core of the investigation is of Russian government activity; the U.S. side is subordinate to that.” https://t.co/ShLgvOLc97
12 Jan, 02:00 PM UTC
Bill Nigh
@BillNigh
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/6K1mf6P4um
12 Jan, 01:53 PM UTC
doggoneit
@doggoneit8
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell - Lawfare https://t.co/ttlEWWqK1U
12 Jan, 01:49 PM UTC
Sean Hecker
@shecker100
@ByronYork Read this: https://t.co/qa3pqUci1B If you cared about the truth, you'd stop spreading unpersuasive @POTUS defense theories and wait to know the facts. But perhaps you prefer aiding and abetting @POTUS?
12 Jan, 02:01 PM UTC
Vincent Wright 🌊
@VincentWright
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/9j5AK7VHW7
12 Jan, 02:00 PM UTC
madtruthbomber
@DavidBeazley4
This article will send @realDonaldTrump over the edge if he reads it... or gets someone to read it and explain it to him... Please do not retweet this and tag @realDonaldTrump... 😏 https://t.co/9DHgtFBuRj
12 Jan, 02:00 PM UTC
KWalsh🗽
@newportwonk
Really interesting new take on the FBI’s investigation and how collusion and the rest is all and “always about Russia” https://t.co/NlOzTGR00p
12 Jan, 02:00 PM UTC
Ryan Bennett
@rjbennett
@jt_tiger @Srcripe @Evan_McMullin @cberrl @AdamSchiff The NYT article has revealed the nature of the investigation is fundamentally different than we believed. https://t.co/6IOMMb9ox7
12 Jan, 01:59 PM UTC
Margaret9 Farrell
@Margaret91448
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/w3idxTpDaa
12 Jan, 01:57 PM UTC
katie beller
@instikate
Chilling. What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell - Lawfare https://t.co/ntdyzqEXZf
12 Jan, 01:57 PM UTC
Cornelia Duncan
@amaselu
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/2Cvij7dUhA
12 Jan, 01:56 PM UTC
Susan Fiehl
@kellumsong
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/wWdiHAB8ZO
12 Jan, 01:55 PM UTC
Danny Diarmada
@DannyDiarmada
@benjaminwittes @lawfareblog The “Obstruction was the Collusion” idea is interesting! One of thise thoughts that, after hearing, you can’t believe you hadn’t thought of it or heard it before! It’s difficult to come up with fresh takes on this topic—well done!
12 Jan, 01:52 PM UTC
Chris
@cunningham_cch
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell - Lawfare https://t.co/jutkyL0MI6
12 Jan, 01:51 PM UTC
tim schreier
@timschreiernyc
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/EUrmLwOpKL #Trump #Russia #Obstruction #Collusion #TrumpRussia #Espionage #Criminal #Spy #Coordination #ObstructionofJustice #FBI
12 Jan, 01:51 PM UTC
Laura
@hoppipolska
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell - Lawfare https://t.co/g2OOJ0P9S2
12 Jan, 01:49 PM UTC
John Makuch
@kooch54
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/t0Q8bvvu66
12 Jan, 01:49 PM UTC
no justice - just us. ⌛️
@billm9
What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York’s Times’s Latest Bombshell https://t.co/RUNIJVfjbS
12 Jan, 01:48 PM UTC

See top twitter trends from United States.

ekla Home | Countries | Trends | @eklabot

Trending on Twitter - Worldwide | Argentina | Australia | Brazil | Canada | France | Germany | Italy | Japan | Mexico | Netherlands | South Korea | Spain | United Kingdom | United States

© 2018, ekla.in. All rights reserved. Created on 12 January, 2019 at 02:02 PM UTC. This page will be automatically deleted in 15 days. Reach out to sid@ekla.in.
ekla's service is built on Twitter's APIs. ekla is not affiliated with Twitter, Inc. ekla's service is intended to augment, supplement or enhance the service provided by Twitter at twitter.com.