Pennsylvania Supreme Court is trending

Pennsylvania Supreme Court is trending on Twitter. Popular tweets on Pennsylvania Supreme Court.


Ad - Top movies on iTunes USA


Marc E. Elias
 @marceelias
🚨BREAKING: Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules that election officials are PROHIBITED from rejecting mail-in ballots based on signature comparison. Nor may a party "challenge based on signature analysis and comparisons." https://t.co/pBa0vyA9h3
23 Oct, 05:27 PM UTC
Chuck Callesto
 @ChuckCallesto
BREAKING REPORT: Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that mail-in ballots CANNOT BE TOSSED because the voter's signature don't match registration form...
23 Oct, 07:34 PM UTC
Stonewall Jackson
@1776Stonewall
WOW — Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules that signatures don’t have to match on absentee ballots. Meaning that even if the signatures do not match, they still can't be rejected. 7-0 vote…
23 Oct, 08:21 PM UTC
James Kosur
 @JamesKosur
JUST IN: "Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules that election officials are PROHIBITED from rejecting mail-in ballots based on signature comparison. Nor may a party "challenge based on signature analysis and comparisons."' -@marceelias Lawyer fighting for Democrats & voting rights.
23 Oct, 05:46 PM UTC
Marc E. Elias
 @marceelias
Yep, it's a Grand Slam Day for voting rights! ✅8th Circuit ✅Pennsylvania Supreme Court ✅North Carolina Supreme Court ✅Pennsylvania Federal District Court Read more👇 https://t.co/pCLA90jwY3 https://t.co/Nad6FzX619
23 Oct, 07:47 PM UTC
Democratic Coalition
 @TheDemCoalition
BREAKING NEWS: The PA state Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that mail-in ballots cannot be tossed because the voter's signature on it may not resemble their signature on their registration form. #MomsBackBiden https://t.co/iKQV3pa3DA
23 Oct, 06:52 PM UTC
Robert Barnes
@Barnes_Law
Pennsylvania Supreme Court continues its work to make fraud as easy as possible for 2020. After first ruling that ballots mailed received after election day w/o a timely postmark had to be counted, they now declare ballots w/o signature matches can count. https://t.co/oghE7c0plB
23 Oct, 07:54 PM UTC
KDKA
 @KDKA
#BREAKING NEWS: The state Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that mail-in ballots cannot be tossed because the voter's signature on it may not resemble their signature on their registration form. https://t.co/1gyJ3aTdjp
23 Oct, 06:29 PM UTC
Mark Joseph Stern
 @mjs_DC
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled—unanimously—that county boards of elections cannot throw out absentee or mail-in ballots due to alleged signature mismatch. Amy Coney Barrett's first vote may be to block this decision. https://t.co/VPyx2x3Gfv
23 Oct, 06:21 PM UTC
The Philadelphia Inquirer
 @PhillyInquirer
Mail ballots cannot be rejected based on a comparison of their signatures to the voters' signatures on file, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said Friday. See more election and voting updates here: https://t.co/CG0Qaf4X4M
23 Oct, 05:43 PM UTC
Alex Salvi
@alexsalvinews
NEW: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules election officials can’t reject mail-in ballots based on signature comparison. https://t.co/41zeIcUP3b
23 Oct, 05:32 PM UTC
Patrick Howley
@HowleyReporter
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is now ordering counties not to reject stupid paper ballots if the signature on it does not match voter registration. THE FIX IS IN!
23 Oct, 07:38 PM UTC
AG Josh Shapiro
 @PAAttorneyGen
Another win for voters in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court today: mail in ballots cannot be rejected based upon signature analysis.
23 Oct, 05:59 PM UTC
zerohedge
@zerohedge
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Counties Can't Reject Mail-In Ballots When Signatures Don't Match https://t.co/eiazbLLGjB
23 Oct, 06:25 PM UTC
Los Angeles Times
 @latimes
Ballots can't be tossed for mismatched signatures, Pennsylvania Supreme Court says https://t.co/HukU3xcBPx
23 Oct, 07:33 PM UTC
José
@yoruguaenusa
BREAKING: Pennsylvania state Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that mail-in ballots cannot be tossed because the voter's signature on it may not resemble their signature on their registration form. https://t.co/ahBylzQ4ub
23 Oct, 07:35 PM UTC
Daily Caller
 @DailyCaller
Pennsylvania Can’t Reject Ballots Over Mismatched Signature, State Supreme Court Rules https://t.co/DDhoQTRtLC
23 Oct, 09:15 PM UTC
Ballotpedia
 @ballotpedia
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to block the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's order extending the receipt deadline for mail-in ballots to Nov. 6 for ballots postmarked on or before Election Day. See more election changes here: https://t.co/cJgpcL9Ayn
23 Oct, 04:57 PM UTC
Baronian Consulting
@BaronianConsult
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Unanimously Rules That Mail-In Ballots Cannot Be Rejected Due to Signature Comparisons https://t.co/4Dl5Aj55BN
23 Oct, 09:45 PM UTC
Bonn Lastfogel
@BonnLastfogel
So we can have forged signatures THIS RIDICULOUS WHY DONT YOU JUST ALLOW VOTING TO CONTINUE SO DEMOCRATS CAN MIRACULOUSLY FIND 62 MILLION BALLOTS FOR BIDEN THAT WERENT COUNTED GIVE ME A BREAK ROTFLMAO PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TAKE YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR https://t.co/ynNDVgZrzX https://t.co/aPXHTpcQ7a
23 Oct, 09:45 PM UTC
Lorraine Ford
@f_lorraine123
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Unanimously Rules That Mail-In Ballots Cannot Be Rejected Due to Signature Comparisons https://t.co/IcEbpGwCWY
23 Oct, 09:44 PM UTC
Gabby Says
@gabriellesays
@Barnes_Law Actually; Pennsylvania Supreme Court continues its work to make *democracy* as easy as possible for 2020. Which, says this lawyer, is an appropriate & important role for a branch of government intended to provide checks and balances on the other two. #PennsylvaniaSupremeCourt
23 Oct, 09:43 PM UTC
Winsome Martin
@compro_tax
Pennsylvania Supreme Court says ballots can’t be rejected based on signature comparisons - POLITICO https://t.co/ZZ8DuXtMTP via @GoogleNews
23 Oct, 09:43 PM UTC
DallenH ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ +++
@d_allen_h
@ryanobles @sarahcwestwood "Washington (CNN)In a sweeping victory for Democrats..." Wonder why CNN describes it as such? 🤔 https://t.co/YJlejWUgeT
23 Oct, 02:37 PM UTC
TheRealSpacewarp
@TSpacewarp
@kenpw97070 @marklevinshow They quoted him accurately describing what should happen as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has tried to overturn a portion of the US Constitution and you leftists love it and call people full of shit for actually describing the Constitution and how it conflicts with Democraps.
23 Oct, 02:02 PM UTC
P.C. Outsider
@PhilOutsider
Despite Biden’s plan to destroy the oil industry, there’s a good chance that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will provide him with Pennsylvania’s electoral votes. https://t.co/qeT5qHHcEB
23 Oct, 01:26 PM UTC
Terence Lenamon
@TerryLenamon
RT @RDunhamDPIC: The #Pennsylvania Supreme Court has denied relief to death-row prisoner #DavidChmiel on his post-conviction challenge to the expert microscopic hair comparison testimony in his case. https://t.co/4yWmAnLPew @DPInfoCtr #deathpenalty https://t.co/2bjCSm0OYB
23 Oct, 04:45 AM UTC
Mitchell Grooms
@digitalwater888
A 'naked ballots' crisis triggered by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court just put 100,000 votes on the line in the key state - https://t.co/d1ESdt2eN9 https://t.co/5npwFXKqpi
23 Oct, 02:46 AM UTC
Richard Hedrick
@scooterhedrick
@realDonaldTrump You're absolutely correct!! We need a couple more republican appointees like John Roberts! https://t.co/gkCkY6r3Qj
23 Oct, 01:09 AM UTC

Ad - Top movies on iTunes United States